Shakespeare’s Sonnet 116
is a well-written, much-loved, and highly praised piece of classic literature,
but to a young girl ignorant of literary intricacies, simply watching a Jane
Austen movie with her dad, it was none of those things—it was magic. The words
danced and swirled and moved in her heart like she’d never felt words do
before. That child was me.
When I watched Ang Lee’s 1995 version of Sense and Sensibility as a little girl
and heard Marianne quote Shakespeare’s beautiful words, I certainly wasn’t
thinking about his use of syntax, rhyme, or sonnet structure. Shakespeare’s
craft with words allowed me to experience the power of poetry without any
knowledge of why it worked. However, I was moved to tears at the pure beauty of
what he had created. His words entered the deepest parts of my heart. Even now,
the words come to me almost unbidden:
Let me
not to the marriage of true minds
Admit
impediments. Love is not love
Which
alters when it alteration finds,
Or bends
with the remover to remove.
These are the words I would find myself whispering alone in
my room at night during my high school days, searching for something more,
praying that love was real and that all men were not as ignorant or selfish as
the boy who had just dropped me off. Poetry helped me form an idea of what true
love was long before my time—causing me to skip the girlish giggles and swoons,
and cling to my belief that love could be true when it was caring and considerate.
Was I fanciful and childish? Carried off in a Cinderella dream? Maybe, but to
me it felt deeper than that. This poem had set off in me the beginnings of
wisdom; a yearning for what I wanted most in this life. It became a kind of
rebellion against the lust, conflict, and brokenness that I saw all around me.
I believed that love was possible, and I believed that it was powerful.
O no! it
is an ever-fixed mark
That
looks on tempests and is never shaken;
Shakespeare’s meticulous diction awakened me to the power of
words. His use of the traditional sonnet structure somehow gave the poem a
dependability and consistency that seemed symbolic itself. His beautiful
lyricism swept me away to another world—a better world—a world where kindness
ruled the day. These words gave me permission to feel; I began to believe that
empathy was strength, and that emotion was not weakness. I have forgotten this
many times, but always this poem always brings me right back. Even as a child,
my heart could feel the truth of the words, and it gave me hope for the future.
For my own future, and the future of the world.
It is the
star to every wand'ring bark,
Whose
worth's unknown, although his height be taken.
What a beautiful sentiment! “It is the star to every
wand’ring bark,/ Whose worth’s unknown, although his height be taken.” I felt
like my height had been taken, and I’d come up short. But maybe my worth was yet
unknown—maybe I didn’t know my own worth, and maybe those around me didn’t
either. Maybe finding my worth would be a journey; the symbolism of a guiding
star hinting that maybe this journey would take some faith.
Imagine my delight when I stumbled upon the same poem in
what would become a beloved book. The book is Blackmoore by Julianne Donaldson. In this story the protagonist hears her best friend reading this poem to his elderly grandfather who is losing his
memory. With this impactful scene, the poem became even more meaningful to me:
Love's
not Time's fool, though rosy lips and cheeks
Within
his bending sickle's compass come;
Love cannot be tricked by time. The personification of both
Love and Time makes these subjects real and tangible. Somehow, giving them names
and personalities helps us understand their intricacies in new light. “Love’s
not Time’s fool,” although “Within his bending sickle’s compass come,” and “Love
alters not with brief hours and weeks.” Real Love is not diminished or
controlled by Time, even as beauty fades, Love grows stronger.
Love
alters not with his brief hours and weeks,
But bears
it out even to the edge of doom.
Love is a journey, just as life is a journey. Words like “wand’ring,”
“bears it out,” “hours and weeks,” and “edge of doom” tell a story. We can almost
see the hero’s arc within the poem as Love itself voyages on.
Poetry such as this reveals our earnest emotions—as if the
use of a dance-like rhythm deliberately shakes it out of us, all while alliteration
like “alters not when it alteration finds” and “remover to remove” sticks it
into our minds for good. In addition, poetry often says what we cannot say. What
this poem said for me was undeniable—I felt that Love was true and somehow these
words had proven it.
If this
be error and upon me prov'd,
I never
writ, nor no man ever lov'd.
In these closing words Shakespeare wrenches you out of the
spell he has previously cast. He calls us to reality by bringing in a first
person narrative, which he hasn’t used since the very beginning of the poem. He
references himself—and swears on the authenticity of his many works of literature and the love of
all men everywhere that what he says is true. Could there be a more profound
promise than that? These closing words connected poet and reader like nothing
else could have. I felt like I knew him—as if we could commune across time and
space to say the same words and feel the same sentiments. Ultimately, this is
what I believe all poetry can do. It is a powerful medium that I believe can
foster connection, understanding, and communication—in other words, it can
foster Love—in unparalleled ways. Just as this one did for me, poems have the
power to slice through the trifling and mundane things of everyday life, and
connect our very hearts.
I really liked your analysis. I thought you did a really good job balancing your personal experience with your literary analysis. How cool that you found the poem again while reading that book! I'm sure that you noticed, but part of the font came out black and I had to highlight it in order to read it against the background haha. But really good job!
ReplyDeleteThank you for your post! I enjoyed both your focus on what it meant to and your analysis of the piece itself. The formatting of the post feels a little off, but that might just be me. Your fonts are a little of in some places, but other than that I felt this post was well done.
ReplyDelete